Albee's play is a telling account of north American society's
view of adoption as SECOND BEST as
compared with the traditional nuclear biological family. Relationship
defined by blood ties take precedence over affinal ties: that is,
people who choose to live together in family groupings through affinity.
"This perspective has led all other families, including adoptive
families, to be defined at best as substitute and at worst as
deviant or deficient." 1
Though the play was written in 1962, it still has relevance
today with science looming over family planning with the advent
of human cloning and increasingly sophisticated assisted reproduction
experiments. Will this century's infertile couples, obsessed with
having a 'child of their own' (read: linked by blood) see cloning
as the only viable solution? Will a clone market grow to feed that
desire?
"The full psychological repercussions in children and adults
are yet to be studied for those born of the revolution in reproductive
technologies. Included in this cohort would be those conceived
through artificial insemination, in vitro fertilization, the use
of surrogate, and embryo transfer. These serve as examples where
knowledge of the genealogical background is often unknown in at
least one of the donors (e.g., ovum or sperm) or entirely irretrievable
because of the use of pooled samples, frozen zygotes, etc. More
to the point, they serve as examples wherein a product-oriented
society sacrifices vital aspects of human psychology, many of
which are directly relevant to the adopted person (...) ". 2
The adoption law reform movement, which advocates for open birth
records and the rights of adoptees to know of their genealogical
background, will serve as a framework for further questioning on
the ethics and rights of children in the age of scientific reproduction.
|