The name of a New England orphanage in the 1930s
THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS 1
echoes the sentimental rendering of the orphans plot
in Dickensian literature. Likewise, the ORPHAN
TRAIN MOVEMENT has been romanticized as an adventurous journey
for orphans gaining a new life in the pure rural environment
of the honest farmer. The orphan was presented as thrown
into the world friendless, lost and wandering, in need of
the saving grace of a good home. 2
ORPHAN TRAIN DITTY
The Orphan Train, is coming into town,
With the orphan babies, who need a home,
Come listen to their stories, come listen to their song,
A song of lost children, just waiting to be found. 3
Idealized language is used to mask the plight of orphans as
the term WANDERERS offers up a romantic
scenario far from the very real economic and social pressures which
had women relinquishing their children to the care of others. In
fact, even though some of the children in orphanages were indeed
orphans having no living relatives to care for them
a good many were simply destitute or defined as illegitimate
for having been born outside of the institute of marriage. In Great
Britain, many of the child migrants sent to Australia (1913-1968)
as well as a great number of the 100,000 home children
shipped to Canada (1869-1948) were not technical orphans, having
at least one living parent. As well, here in Canada, many of Quebecs
Duplessis orphans (1930-1950s) were not orphans but
children of unmarried parents at a time when illegitimacy was seen
as a great social burden.
IDEALIZED LANGUAGE also shaped
reality for children adopted in the last century as the question
Where do babies come from? brings up the adoption story.
Many adoptive parents even today, tell their children Wassons
classic childrens story, The Chosen Baby (1939),
4 when attempting to explain how they came
to them. The story begins with the adoption and glosses over the
ugly fact of abandonment. This myth neglects the fact that a child
was first unwanted to be chosen. 5
Yet again, the term UNWANTED is
a loaded word which weighs heavily on the adoptees psyche.
It is a term that may serve to reassure adoptive parents: a childless
couple could gain comfort in the thought of saving an
abandoned, unwanted baby. While many babies were indeed put up for
adoption because the parents did not want to parent, other babies
were very much wanted relinquished because of familial, social
and financial pressures.
Parents telling their adopted children that they were CHOSEN
conjures up the image of children being picked from rows upon rows
of cribs in an orphanage setting for the adoptee. A more common
scenario was how the Placement Agencies matched children to families:
the sex, age, race, religion and physical appearance of the child
was used tp match them with prospective parents. The adoptive parents
have little choice in the process. A child does not WANDER
into a new home, they are placed out for economic and social reasons
and to fill the needs of childless couples.
And so begins the fragmented adoption narrative. Adopted children
piece their stories from many sources: a chance remark, overheard
conversations, and their own fantasies. Images of being conceived
in a filing cabinet, grown in a cabbage patch, carried by a stork,
plucked from a row of cribs, saved from the gutter, abducted from
royalty, or selected from a furniture store display, abound in adoptees
imagination. All of these fantasies involve the child being chosen
for their unique qualities. It is disillusioning to find out that
often, there is little choice in adoption for any of the involved
parties.
|